Towards Fairness in Practice: A Practitioner-Oriented Rubric for Evaluating Fair ML Toolkits


In order to support fairness-forward thinking by machine learning (ML) practitioners, fairness researchers have created toolkits that aim to transform state-of-the-art research contributions into easily-accessible APIs. Despite these efforts, recent research indicates a disconnect between the needs of practitioners and the tools offered by fairness research. By engaging 20 ML practitioners in a simulated scenario in which they utilize fairness toolkits to make critical decisions, this work aims to utilize practitioner feedback to inform recommendations for the design and creation of fair ML toolkits. Through the use of survey and interview data, our results indicate that though fair ML toolkits are incredibly impactful on users’ decision-making, there is much to be desired in the design and demonstration of fairness results. To support the future development and evaluation of toolkits, this work offers a rubric that can be used to identify critical components of Fair ML toolkits.



November 2022 | NeurIPS

Society of Agents: Regrets Bounds of Concurrent Thompson Sampling

Yan Chen, Perry Dong, Qinxun Bai, Maria Dimakopoulou, Wei Xu, Zhengyuan Zhou

November 2022 | NeurIPS

Temporally-Consistent Survival Analysis

Lucas Maystre, Daniel Russo

November 2022 | NeurIPS

Disentangling Causal Effects from Sets of Interventions in the Presence of Unobserved Confounders

Olivier Jeunen, Ciarán M. Gilligan-Lee, Rishabh Mehrotra, Mounia Lalmas